New York Probate Lawyer Blog

February 7, 2011

Payable-on-Death Accounts one Option for Distributing Estate Funds in New York

Consulting a New York City probate attorney is always the best option when establishing estate plans, executing a Will or deciding upon the best course of action for distributing your estate after your passing.

For some, probate court is a good option. Others may choose estate planning options that permit them to bypass probate court. This is the third blog in our series. Recently we wrote avoiding probate court is not for everyone and about the many advantages to avoiding probate. Here we are going to look at some common issues with bank accounts. One option is to create a Totten Trust, tentative trust or informal trust. These are payable-on-death accounts. Adding a payable-on-death designation can be done for many types of accounts, including certificates of deposit, checking and savings. By listing the beneficiary on the signature card, you have established where the assets go at the time of your passing.

This is not the same as a joint account. A joint account frequently comes with “right of survivorship.” In these cases, a POD (Payable On Death) designation would only apply after the death of the second account holder.

Beneficiary issues for bank account inheritance in New York:

-Children: While you can name a minor child as POD beneficiary, you might want to explore appointing an adult to hold the money on a child’s behalf. Or make other arrangements to provide some restrictions and guidance. Appointing a guardian for the funds can be easily and inexpensively done through the Uniform Transfer to Minors Act. In New York, such custodianship would be good until a minor child turns 21.

-Multiple Beneficiaries: Can be designated on the appropriate bank documents. However, you cannot name an alternate payee.

-Your Spouse: May have rights to the funds in the account and a POD should not be used as an attempt to exclude them from collecting.

-Creditors: You can’t use a POD to empty an account and short-change creditors.

You may also run into issues by trying to use a Will to change a POD designation. In cases where you change your mind, you can simply close the account or you can go to the bank and change the paperwork.

And, like with most types of inheritance, you may owe New York estates taxes and federal estate taxes on the proceeds.

February 4, 2011

New York Guardianship Property Transfers Require Court Approval And Review

by Jules M. Haas

The New York Probate Lawyer Blog has previously discussed numerous aspects concerning the appointment and duties of an Article 81 personal needs and property management Guardian.

Very often the assets of the incapacitated person includes real property such as a home. It may become necessary for the Guardian to sell the home if the incapacitated person no longer can live in a community setting due to illness, or if the maintenance of the home is unaffordable or if the proceeds from the sale are needed for the person’s long term care.

Other considerations may be presented where the home might be transferred to a relative in conjunction with Medicaid or estate planning and thereby preserved for the incapacitated person, as well as family members, to live in.

An interesting situation involving such a transfer arose in the case of White v. Prister, 912 N.Y.S.2d 127 (2nd Dept. 2010). In White, a daughter had been appointed as guardian of the person and property of her mother, Lila. Following the appointment, the daughter moved into the mother’s house and after a few years asked the Court for permission to transfer the title to the house to the daughter/guardian “for Medicaid and estate planning purposes.” The Court approved the transfer and the deed to the house was placed in the daughter’s name.

After Lila died, her great granddaughter, on behalf of Lila’s estate, sought to set aside the deed. The Court refused to undo the transfer and dismissed the great granddaughter’s case finding that the daughter was allowed by the family to live in the house for many years after Lila’s death without any objection. Thus, the equitable concept of “laches” or undue delay prevented the voiding of the deed. The Court found that it would have been inequitable to force the daughter to give up the house at such late date.

February 2, 2011

Rights Of The New York Surviving Spouse Are Not Clear In Same-Sex Marriages

by Jules M. Haas

New York and Federal Laws generally provide many advantages and protections for married individuals. For example, in New York a person may not disinherit his or her spouse. New York Estates, Powers and Trusts Law (EPTL) Section 5-1.1-A provides a spouse with a Right of Election to take a portion of the deceased spouse’s estate. This share is, subject to a complex formula, equal to the greater of $50,000.00 or one-third of the estate.

Similarly, when a spouse dies intestate (without a Last Will), Section 4-1.1 of the EPTL provides for the spouse to obtain the entire estate or at least $50,000.00 and one-half of the residue or balance if the decedent had issue (i.e., children). Also, New York Courts have given spousal status to the surviving spouse of a same-sex marriage performed in a jurisdiction outside of New York.

On the Federal level, the Federal (and New York) estate tax laws provide for a 100% marital deduction for assets passing upon death between spouses. However, the Federal estate tax spousal deduction has been denied to a same-sex couple. As reported in the New York Law Journal on November 12, 2010 by Victor Li, New Challenges To DOMA Filed in Connecticut and New York, the Federal 1996 Defense Of Marriage Act (DOMA) “defines marriage as a legal union between a man and a woman.”

Thus, pursuant to DOMA, and as reported in the Article, the federal estate tax marital deduction was denied to the surviving partner of a same-sex marriage which resulted in a tax liability of $363,053.

As reported, a number of federal lawsuits are pending challenging the constitutionality of DOMA. As can be seen from this controversy, a person’s status as a spouse and as a distributee (next of kin) of a decedent can be the subject of contention and litigation in the New York Surrogate’s Court. The determination of these issues can effect the rights of individuals to inherit from a decedent as well as the tax liability of the decedent’s estate.

January 28, 2011

Guardianship, Special-Needs Trusts In New York Should Be Considered When Caring For Those With Disabilities

by Jules M. Haas

As we begin 2011, we encourage you to take special care in planning for the welfare of a child with special needs. Consulting a New York City guardianship attorney is a great way to bring peace of mind to the issue of caring for a child or adult-child in your absence.

In other cases, a New York Article 81 Guardianship proceeding can assist in caring for an older loved one who is no longer able to manage their affairs.One aspect that is often overlooked is the need to provide for the care of such dependents in your New York estate plans. Leaving an estate to a loved one can prevent them from collecting state or federal aid. Life insurance proceeds can lead to the same unwanted result. Establishing a special-needs trust is one option that will ensure the long-term care of a loved one in your absence.

When a child with disabilities reaches the age of maturity, a parent or loved one may petition for guardianship under Article 17A of the New York Surrogate’s Court Procedure Act. More than 280,000 people in New York are believed to have mental retardation and another 24,000 have cerebral palsy. The New York State Mental Hygiene Law defines mental disability as:

-Attributed to mental retardation, cerebral palsy, epilepsy, neurological impairment, autism or other closely related condition.

-Originates before a person reaches the age of 22 and has continued or is expected to continue indefinitely.

-Constitutes a substantial handicap.

Once such guardianship is established, you will be able to continue to assist an adult child with special needs in whatever capacity is necessary. However, caring for them after your departure will still require sound estate planning, including a special needs trust or a supplemental needs trust. These investment vehicles will permit your estate to go toward the care of a loved one with special needs without jeopardizing government benefits, Medicaid or other assistance.

January 27, 2011

Avoiding Probate Court Process In New York Not For Everyone

by Jules M. Haas

While many seek the advice of a New York City probate lawyer to establish a Will, trusts, or other estate plans, far too many will die intestate, without a Will or other directions for the dispersal of their estate upon their death.

As we wrote recently on our New York Probate Lawyer Blog, trusts can be made to keep your estate out of the probate process, which can be time consuming and unnecessarily public. Yet there are some things that cannot be accomplished by avoiding probate in New York. Avoiding Taxes: Certainly comprehensive estate planning in New York may save thousands in taxes. But the mere fact that an estate avoids probate does not mean that it avoids tax obligations. State and federal estate taxes, capital gains taxes and real estate taxes are just a few of the tax obligations that estates frequently face.

Rights of immediate family: Avoiding the probate process, in general, does not change the fact that your spouse has a right to inherit. A spouse who does not receive a “statutory share” may go to court to claim property you have put in trust. In most cases, you are not obligated to leave your children an inheritance.

Creditors’ Rights: Bypassing probate may not relieve you of your obligation to creditors or their right to collect upon your death. If you do not leave enough assets outside of trust to pay your debts and taxes, those assets may be claimed by creditors after your death.

Creditors have strict time limits for making a probate claim. This is one area where going through probate court has its advantages. A creditor that does not make a claim within the appropriate time limit, may be barred from attempting to collect.

Understanding your rights to probate — as well as the ways to avoid the probate process — can allow you to make informed decisions as part of your estate planning in 2011 and beyond.

January 25, 2011

Many Advantages To Avoiding Probate Court In New York

by Jules M. Haas

There can be many benefits to avoiding the probate court process in the settling of an estate, including more privacy. Contacting an estate planning lawyer in New York City is a good first step toward putting your affairs in order as we begin 2011.

This is the first of several posts to our New York Probate Lawyer Blog that will examine ways to avoid the probate court process and the possible benefits and consequences of doing so.In general, if a decedent has no Will, known as an intestate estate, or if his or her estate is governed by a Will, the estate will go through the probate court process for dispersal to named heirs or living relatives. Some small estates, valued at less than $30,000, may avoid the probate court process.

New York does not follow the uniform probate code, as is in place in some other states, which can make the process longer and more costly in some instances. Establishing a trust in New York or taking other steps to avoid probate, may be to your advantage in many instances.

Other common challenges inherent in the probate process include:

-Identifying and contacting relatives: In cases where spouse and children are present this is not much of an issue. But in cases where a decedent passes away with only distant relatives, tracking down relatives can be an unnecessary headache.

-Lack of privacy: Probate court is a public forum and a family’s private finances and other information will become public for all to see.

By creating trust funds and taking other steps to avoid the probate court process in New York, you can ensure that your heirs receive the inheritance privately, with as little cost, hassle and wait as possible. Probate court does a lot of things right — including ensuring the proper distribution of your assets to your chosen heirs — but the same may be accomplished in a private, expedited manner with a little forethought and some basic estate planning.

January 19, 2011

Life Insurance Can Provide Many Benefits To A New York Estate Plan

by Jules M. Haas

The New York Probate Lawyer Blog has previously discussed the need for estate planning documents including a Last Will, Health Care Proxy, Living Will and Power of Attorney. Life Insurance can also provide a valuable estate planning tool. In its most fundamental function, life insurance can add a tremendous amount of liquidity and value to an estate. The payment upon death of a life insurance policy with a cash value of say $500,000.00 most certainly would provide an immediate benefit to the named beneficiaries.

Life insurance products can be complex and can take various forms such as term life, whole life or universal life. Before purchasing life insurance, a person should fully research and understand the different aspects of each product and obtain advise from professionals including insurance brokers, attorneys and financial advisors.

Additionally, the selection and designation of the insurance beneficiaries must be considered and made so that the life insurance proceeds are paid in a manner that is part of an overall estate plan. Very often people take out life insurance and either forget to name beneficiaries or beneficiaries who were named are no longer alive or perhaps are no longer intended by the policy owner to be the preferred recipients.

While life insurance can provide a huge benefit upon a person’s death, there are also a number of potential advantages that arise during a person’s life. One very interesting advantage is that a policyholder may sell their interest in the policy to another during their life. The investor essentially pays a fee to the owner and invests in the prospect that the person whose life is insured will die sooner rather than later. The insurance proceeds are paid to the investor. This arrangement is called “Stranger-owned life insurance” (“SOLI” or “STOLI”) and was recently found not to violate New York Insurance Law by the New York State Court of Appeals in Kramer v. Phoenix Life Insurance Co., decided on November 17, 2010. Thus, a person can obtain an immediate pre-death benefit from insurance on his or her life by assigning the policy to an investor.

January 12, 2011

Safekeeping of A New York Last Will Is Vital To Protect Beneficiaries

by Jules M. Haas

The New York Probate Law Blog previously talked about the importance of maintaining a Last Will in a safe and secure location. After investing the time and effort to develop an estate plan and finalize a Will and other estate planning documents such as advance directives, it would be unfortunate if the Will could not be located after a person dies.

As previously pointed out, there are a number of alternatives available with regard to safeguarding a Will. The original can be left with an attorney or kept by the person himself. A Will can also be filed with the Surrogate’s Court. Keeping a Will in a safe deposit box can be problematic since a Court Order may be required to open the box after a person’s death, thus delaying estate settlement proceedings. Also, a legal presumption may arise that the Will was revoked if it is kept by the person himself or herself and the Will cannot be located after death. Attempting to probate a photocopy of a misplaced Will can be extremely difficult.

Issues that arise concerning locating a decedent’s Will are evident from a recent lawsuit filed by the sibling’s of Mama Cass, who was a member of the 1960’s group The Mamas and The Papas. As reported in the New York Law Journal on January 11, 2011, from an article appearing in The National Law Journal by Leigh Jones, Mama Cass’ died in 1974. In their lawsuit, the siblings alleged that a law firm which recently located Mama Cass’ 1967 Will in their archives, had told them at the time of her death that a Will could not be found. Since Mama Cass had apparently died without a Will, her estate was distributed pursuant to California’s law of intestacy rather than in accordance with the terms of the just found Will. As a result, the siblings claim that they were damaged by not receiving a part of the estate. “The lawsuit claims malpractice, negligent misrepresentation and fraud.”

January 5, 2011

New York City Estate Leaves Popular Upper East Side Restaurant to Employees

by Jules M. Haas

The Huffington Post reports that the owner of a popular Upper East Side restaurant has left the business to its longtime manager.

New York estate lawyers frequently report here on our New York Probate Lawyer Blog about the challenge of leaving a business to heirs. Without proper estate planning, the results can be tragic. It is not unusual for heirs to be forced to sell a business to pay taxes and satisfy other obligations as a result of an inheritance.State and federal inheritance taxes, capital gains taxes and property taxes are just a few of the issues that can plague the transfer or sale of a family business. In some cases, life insurance is bought to assist with the cost but can have its own implications if not properly purchased and structured.

Business owners should do themselves and their heirs a favor and make visiting an estate planning attorney a resolution in 2011.

In this case, the New York Times reports that Elaine Kaufman’s death in December left many wondering what would become of “Elaine’s” the popular eatery on the Upper East Side. Turns out, the owner has left the restaurant to her longtime manager Diane Becker.

Kaufman also left much of her estate to Becker and to her longtime maitre d’hotel, Giovanni Adamo, known by regulars as Gianni.

The new owners promise to run the restaurant the way it has always run, saying “the only missing link is Elaine.”

January 3, 2011

Drafting New York Power of Attorney Best Left To Experienced Law Firm

by Jules M. Haas

Family gatherings around the holidays can make it clear that a loved one will need assistance to maintain his or her independence, or may even require an assisted living facility or a nursing home.

Frequently, a New York power of attorney will be granted to friend or family member who agrees to help with an aging loved one’s affairs. Too often, neither the grantor (known as the principal), nor the grantee (known as the agent) have a proper understanding of the requirements, limitations and consequences of a power of attorney.A power of attorney can be structured for a single purpose — such as disposing of a piece of property — or can grant broad powers to conduct business on a person’s behalf. It can also be limited to a specific time frame.

Additionally a Living Will is a document detailing a person’s desire as to whether or not to be maintained on life support. New York’s Health Care Proxy law provides a separate document that provides a health-care agent. And a durable power of attorney in New York will remain in effect if you become incapacitated.

In general, it is best to structure a power of attorney in such a way as to be limited beyond the scope of the desired task. Where problems frequently occur, is when a broad power of attorney is granted for a specific task, which can permit far greater uses than the principal intended.

In other cases, a power of attorney is not the best legal avenue to achieve the desired result. In all cases, the best course of action for protecting your rights is to contact a New York City probate attorney to discuss your individual needs and the available options.