New York Probate Lawyer Blog

Article 81 of the New York Mental Hygiene Law ("MHL") is entitled "Proceedings for Appointment of a Guardian for Personal Needs or Property Management". The New York Probate Lawyer Blog has published numerous posts regarding many different aspects of the Guardianship laws.

One of the main requirements for the appointment of a Guardian is that the Court must find that a person is "incapacitated" (MHL Section 81.02). However, the statute also provides that the Court may appoint a Guardian where a person "agrees to the appointment". The vast majority of Guardianship cases typically involve a situation where a person is found to be incapacitated rather than just agreeing to such appointment. In fact, there appears to be sort of an inconsistency between having to declare someone to lack capacity while at the same time allowing them to consent or agree to have a Guardian.

Most recently, Justice H. Patrick Leis, III (Supreme Court, Suffolk County) confronted this issue in Matter of Buffalino which was decided on March 6, 2013 and reported in the New York Law Journal on March 15, 2013. In Buffalino, a person identified as "Mr. D.", who had been suffering with brain cancer, consented to the appointment of a Guardian. At that time, the Court found that Mr. D had the capacity to agree to the appointment. Thereafter, Mental Hygiene Legal Service, on behalf of Mr. D., sought to discharge the Guardian and the Guardian sought to expand his powers and keep the Guardianship in place.

The Court recognized that Article 81 did not clearly define the test to be used to decide whether someone has the capacity to agree to have a Guardian appointed. The Court clearly recognized that determining capacity to consent is not the same as the full review required by a Court hearing to show incapacity and that a finding of capacity to consent does not automatically result in a determination of incapacity.

After reviewing all of the evidence presented, the Court in Buffalino decided that the current Guardian could not demonstrate that Mr. D. required a Guardian and, therefore, discharged the Guardian.

The Buffalino case shows the problems and limitations that may be encountered when a Guardianship is based upon the consent of the person who is disabled. There appears to be an absence of certainty and the long-term ability of the Guardian to act on behalf of the ward. Due to these limitations and the inherent difficulty of determining whether an alleged incapacitated person has at least enough capacity to consent, there are generally few cases where the Guardianship is allowed based upon consent.

Unfortunately, the necessity for a Guardian where a person lacks capacity pervades both the rich and less fortunate. Recent events have been reported concerning Guardianships for film stars Mickey Rooney and Zsa Zsa Gabor. Bill Hetherman reported on March 4, 2013 in the Daily News.com that a probate court judge allowed Mickey Rooney's Conservator to sell his million dollar home. In an article reported in mydesert.com on February 24, 2013, it was reported that a Court extended the Conservatorship over Zsa Zsa Gabor.

Continue reading "A New York Guardianship Based Upon Consent Does Not Constitute Incapacity" »

New York Guardianship Attorneys are familiar with Article 81 of the Mental Hygiene Law ("MHL") which provides the statutory provisions governing Guardianships in New York. When a person is determined to be incapacitated and a Guardian is appointed for property management or personal needs, the Court will issue an Order and Judgment specifying the Guardian's duties and powers. Thereafter, the County Clerk will issue a Commission which is the formal certification of the Guardian's appointment.

A Guardianship is generally ended upon the death of the incapacitated person. The Court Order and Judgment usually sets forth the procedures that are to be followed when the incapacitated person dies. These requirements typically re-state portions of the MHL law. For example, MHL 81.44 entitled "Proceedings upon the death of an incapacitated person", contains a number of requirements including that within twenty (20) days after the incapacitated person dies a Guardian must send a statement of death to the Court examiner and the estate personal representative. Also, within 150 days of death the Guardian must serve a statement of assets and deliver all guardianship property to the estate personal representative.

In addition to the requirements of MHL 81.44 other sections of the law also relate to post-death procedures. MHL 81.21(a)(14) allows a Guardian to pay funeral expenses for the incapacitated person and MHL 81.21 (a)(20) gives the power to "defend or maintain any judicial action or proceeding to a conclusion until an executor or administrator is appointed."

As stated in MHL 81.44, the Guardian is required to prepare and file a final report or accounting. As can be seen, accepting an appointment as Guardian involves a great deal of responsibility. Both before and after the death of the incapacitated person, the Guardian must maintain detailed reports to be filed with the Court regarding the person's assets, income, expenses and general welfare. When an incapacitated person dies, all of this information transfers over to the estate representative who must review the Guardian's transactions and determine whether to provide final approval or acceptance of the Guardian's conduct. If the estate representative, such as an Executor or Administrator, feels that the Guardian did not act properly, objections can be filed to the Guardianship Accounting and the Court will determine whether any corrections or other remedy is required.

Guardianship and estate proceedings often interconnect especially since many Article 81 Guardianship matters concern older individuals who have become disabled due to physical illness or other conditions such as dementia. As a Guardianship and Estate Lawyer I have represented individuals involved in all of these types of proceedings. Sometimes my clients have been involved in Guardianship proceedings and then have requested that I assist with representation in probate or administration matters after the incapacitated person has died.

Continue reading "New York Guardianships End Upon the Death of the Incapacitated Person" »

New York Court proceedings involving Incapacitated Persons require careful scrutiny by the Court. When a person who lacks capacity is a party to a legal action such as a defendant or respondent, it is imperative that such person's rights are protected since their ability to defend themselves is impaired.

In the typical Guardianship Proceeding under Article 81 of the Mental Hygiene Law ("MHL"), the Court will appoint either a Court Evaluator or an attorney to represent the Alleged Incapacitated Person ("AIP"). Sometimes the Court will appoint both an attorney and a Court Evaluator. MHL Section 81.10 entitled "Counsel" sets forth the circumstances in which an attorney will be appointed by the Court for the AIP. MHL 81.09 entitled "Appointment of Court Evaluator," discusses such appointment. While a Court Evaluator does not act as the attorney for an AIP, the Evaluator will interact with the AIP and perform an investigation for the Court and can, among other duties, determine whether the Court should be informed to appoint an attorney for the AIP. All in all, the MHL statutes provide for a number of avenues to insure that the AIP is protected in the Court proceedings.

Serious issues arise, however, when a person who is suffering from an incapacity becomes involved in Court proceedings that are not covered by the MHL. For example, it is not uncommon for such a person to be ill and hospitalized or affected by dementia or Alzheimer's disease. Due to these types of circumstances, a person may forget, or be unable, to pay bills such as their rent or mortgage. Non-payment of these items will eventually result in lawsuits for eviction or foreclosure. Unfortunately, someone who is sued by a landlord or mortgage company may have no one around to help them or to seek the appointment of an Article 81 Guardian. In such cases the impaired person is completely vulnerable and often unable to defend themselves in an ordinary eviction or foreclosure action. In these cases if the Court is aware of a person's disability the Court has the authority to appoint a limited guardian to protect a person's interest in the particular lawsuit. Section 1201 of the New York Civil Practice Law and Rules allows a Court to appoint a Guardian ad Litem for an adult person who is "incapable of adequately prosecuting or defending his rights."

In many instances the Court may be unaware of a person's condition since the person, due to lack of understanding or ability, merely defaults and does not appear before the Court to represent his interests. In a recent case entitled Financial Freedom Acquisition LLC v. Evelyn L. Jackson, the Honorable Charles J. Markey (Supreme Court, Queens County), in a decision dated December 24, 2012 and reported in a New York Law Journal on January 29, 2013, dismissed a foreclosure lawsuit against an individual who had been in a nursing home at the time of the Summons and Complaint were allegedly served on her. After an extensive investigation by the Court appointed Guardian ad Litem, the Court found that the property owner lacked the mental capacity to understand the Court papers and it was questionable whether the Court papers were properly served upon the homeowner in the nursing home.

As a New York Guardianship Attorney, I have represented many clients involved in Article 81 proceedings. Sometimes, these proceedings are precipitated by other Court actions such as landlord/tenant evictions or foreclosure lawsuits that require the appointment of a Guardian to help protect the rights of an AIP. In these matters, it may be that multiple Court actions are occurring at the same time and quick action is needed so that an AIP's home is not lost through no fault of their own.

Continue reading "New York Incapacitated Persons Must Be Given Proper Legal Notice" »

New York Guardianship Laws are contained in Article 81 of the Mental Hygiene Law (MHL). These statutory provisions are utilized in many situations where a person in need is Alleged to be Incapacitated. Quite often the Alleged Incapacitated Person ("AIP") is elderly and is suffering from the effects of a sudden medical condition such as a stroke or cardiac arrest or the long term deterioration of mental capacity due to dementia.

Whatever the circumstances may be, the family or friends of an elderly individual who loses the ability to attend to Activities of Daily Living, can follow the procedures outlined in Article 81 and attempt to have a Guardian appointed. New York Guardianship attorneys provide guidance to their clients who want to petition the Court for the appointment of a Guardian of the Person or Guardian for Property Management.

The Guardianship law provides a sort of safety net for persons lacking capacity, particularly in the case of the elderly. MHL Section 81.06 entitled "Who may commence a proceeding", allows a Guardianship Petition to be commenced by just about anyone who has a concern about the AIP including anyone who resides with the AIP and "a person otherwise concerned with the welfare of the person. . . ." While petitions for Guardianship are usually commenced by family members, the proceedings are sometimes started by a hospital, a nursing home or a governmental agency such as the New York City Department of Social Services where Adult Protective Services provides community intervention. By having an expansive list of individuals and entities that can intercede on behalf of an AIP, there is a greater possibility that an AIP can receive Court intervention and protection particularly where no family member exists or the AIP's family will not become involved.

A recent article in FoxNews.com published on December 28, 2012 describes the situation of the elderly in China where the national legislature amended its laws to require that adult children visit their elderly parents "often" or run the risk of being sued by the parent. According to the article, the law was instituted due to a number of factors including increased elderly population in China where the social safety net is lacking and there is a limit on family size which creates a large financial burden for elderly care on just a single child.

One can only imagine the plethora of lawsuits that would deluge the Courts if such a law was enacted in New York. While Guardianship proceedings in New York may be formalistic by requiring Court papers and hearings in front of a Judge, the proceedings do provide a process to protect elderly persons from harm due to incapacity. Of course, Estate Planning prior to incapacity in the form of a Health Care Proxy, Living Will, Living Trust and Last Will is always the best course to follow in order to avoid the need for a Guardianship.

Continue reading "New York Guardianship Laws Can Provide a Safety Net for Elderly Individuals" »

The New York Probate Lawyer Blog has discussed many of the proceedings that can arise in the Surrogate's Court such as the Manhattan Surrogate's Court and Nassau Surrogate's Court. Each of the counties in New York State has its own Surrogate's Court.

The various proceedings include Probate Proceedings, Intestate Administration Proceedings, Accounting Proceedings, Kinship Proceedings, and various other Miscellaneous Proceedings such as proceedings to revoke the appointment of a fiduciary.

In order for the Court to determine the issues in the cases that are filed, the Court must be certain that all parties interested in the case have received a proper notice and have had an opportunity to appear before the Court and protect their interests. Very often, the Notice that a party receives is a Citation or an Order and Show Cause. These Notices must be properly served on a party and provide information as to the date, time and place of the Court hearing.

It is not uncommon in many cases that one of the parties may not be legally capable to protect their interests or appear in Court. An infant (i.e., someone under age 18) or a person who is incapacitated cannot act for his or her own welfare. When these situations arise, there are a number of avenues that can be followed so that the incompetent party can participate in the Court proceeding.

With regard to an infant, he or she may appear by a Court appointed guardian of his or her property. See Surrogate's Court Procedure Act (SCPA) Section 402. This section also provides that an incapacitated person may appear by a Court appointed guardian. Article 81 of the Mental Hygiene Law provides an extensive procedure for the appointment of a Guardian of the person and property for an incapacitated person.

When an infant or other disabled person has not had a Guardian appointed to represent them or when the Court feels that such Guardian cannot adequately represent them, the Court can appoint a Guardian ad Litem. SCPA 403 provides for the appointment of a Guardian ad Litem selected by the Court but also provides a procedure whereby the Guardian ad Litem can be nominated by an infant over 14 years old or his parent or guardian. Of course, such nomination is subject to approval and appointment by the Court.

In a recent case entitled a Will of Nanaline Duke, decided by Manhattan Surrogate Nora Anderson on November 28, 2012 and reported in the New York Law Journal on December 10, 2012, the Court allowed the family members to nominate the Guardian ad Litem.

Typically, the Guardian ad Litem will act as the representative of the person under disability and protect his or her interest in the Court case. SCPA 405 provides the procedure for the Guardian ad Litem to be paid for services rendered.

Estate Litigation involves many complex issues and procedures. As a New York Estate Lawyer I have represented many clients where the Court has appointed a Guardian ad Litem to represent a party's interest. I have also acted as the attorney for Guardians who are acting on behalf of incapacitated individuals. For example, in a situation where a decedent dies intestate and his or her sole heir is incapacitated, I have petitioned the Court to appoint the sole heir as an Article 81 Guardian who then had the authority to act as the Administrator of the decedent's estate.

Continue reading "New York Surrogate's Court Proceedings May Require A Guardian Ad Litem" »

The New York Probate Lawyer Blog has posted many items concerning Estate Litigation. Litigation in New York Estates in common in the context of a Will Contest where a distributee (next of kin) such as a child is either completely excluded from the Will or left a bequest that is less than expected. Other typical situations are where a Will disposes of an estate to unrelated third parties such as a caretaker or friend. Allegations concerning undue influence, lack of testamentary capacity or duress usually result from such occurrences. Where a Will is contested, the focus is not only on the decedent but also on the witnesses to the Will and the attorney draftsperson who can testify and shed light on the circumstances surrounding the creation of the estate plan and the Will execution process.

However, not all estate disputes concern bequests that emanate from a Will after death. Many times controversy surrounds inter vivos or lifetime gifts that are made by a decedent. Such gifts can be subject to attack based upon similar grounds of lack of capacity. Often, the lifetime gifts appear inconsistent with, and actually can destroy, an estate plan that the decedent set forth in a Last Will or Living Trust document.

Gift litigation can take place in different forms. Sometimes, prior to a person's death, an Article 81 Guardianship proceeding may be commenced due to a person's incapacity. Section 81.29 of the New York Mental Hygiene Law gives the Court the power to revoke transfers that were made by an incapacitated person. In situations that come to light after a decedent's death, an estate fiduciary, such as Executor or Administrator, can seek to recover assets for the estate where the life-time transfer appears to be improper. Proceedings for the turn-over of assets are provided in New York Surrogate's Court Procedure Act Section 2103.

An estate fiduciary has the responsibility to attempt to marshal and collect all of the assets that rightfully belong to the decedent. Demonstrating that a person lacked the capacity to make a certain lifetime gift is not easy. An example of the difficulty in prevailing with such a claim is shown in the recent case of Estate of Magda Cordell McHale, decided by Surrogate Barbara Howe of Erie County on September 28, 2012 and reported in the New York Law Journal on October 9, 2012.

In McHale, a beneficiary under the decedent's Last Will objected to the fiduciary accounting due to the failure to include certain charitable gifts the decedent made shortly before her death. After a hearing the Court concluded that the decedent had both the "intent" and "capacity" to make the pre-death gift.

Cases such as McHale present many difficult issues involving estate settlement and fiduciary responsibility. I have represented individual family members who have felt that such pre-death gifts were the result of undue influence. I have similarly defended individuals who have received pre-death gifts where assertions have been made that such gifts were the result of undue influence. In all cases, it is important to review the history of the decedent, the expressions of intent that may have been made and the relationships been the various parties in order to have a full and clear picture about the proprietary of the disputed transfer.

Continue reading "New York Gifts Made Prior to Death Are Often the Subject of After Death Disputes" »

New York Guardianship proceedings can be found to be an appropriate remedy in varied situations. Typically, the Article 81 Guardianship is associated with an elderly person suffering from an illness such as dementia or Alzheimer's disease or a person who has suffered a severe physical event such as a stroke or heart attack. These situations are a garden variety basis for the appointment of a Guardian for property management and personal needs.

New York Guardianship attorneys, however, are familiar with the many other situations in which a Guardian may be needed. For example, in many instances, younger individuals may be incapacitated due to mental or physical disabilities that are birth related. In these situations, a Guardian may be necessitated not only for personal needs but also to handle monetary awards or funds the person may be entitled to due to a settlement from a lawsuit. The Guardianship Court is often asked to allow the establishment of a Supplemental Needs Trust to hold these funds so that the incapacitated person does not lose the benefit of governmental programs such as Social Security Disability or Medicaid.

Many guardianship cases also involve issues relating to the housing of the person who is incapacitated. Such person may live in a rental apartment or even own a cooperative apartment. Due to the person's incapacity, the rent or maintenance due on the apartment may go unpaid and subject the person to possible eviction or termination of their leasehold interest.

Other events that may result in eviction proceedings or lease terminations are where the tenant creates a nuisance by engaging in loud or abusive conduct or exhibits Collyers Syndrome which is the excessive hoarding and accumulation of items in the apartment. These activities create a climate where both the incapacitated individual and other tenants in the building are at risk.

When a person is exhibiting the above described behavior, the building management may commence eviction proceedings or, sometimes, contact Adult Protective Services of the New York City Human Resources Administration to intervene. APS will attempt to provide the tenant with assistance, if possible.

A Manhattan Guardianship lawyer, Queens Guardianship lawyer or Brooklyn Guardianship lawyer who represents a family member attempting to obtain appointment as a Guardian,
can ask the Guardianship Judge to issue a stay or injunction to stop the eviction proceedings of the incapacitated person until a Guardian has been appointed. Such relief is usually granted by the Court.

The New York Probate Lawyer Blog has discussed in previous posts that a Guardian will be appointed by the Court if the Court determines by "clear and convincing evidence" that a person is incapacitated. New York Mental Hygiene Law ("MHL") section 81.02. When a Court is considering the case, it will review the ability of the person to manage activities of daily living such as "money management", "grooming", and "housing". MHL section 81.03 (h). Therefore, when a person fails to pay rent or creates a nuisance or dangerous condition in an apartment, such activity is evidence of incapacity.

I have represented many clients who have petitioned to be Guardians in situations where their friends or relatives are on the verge of eviction or lease termination due to failure to pay rent or creating a nuisance condition. In these cases, quick action and Court filings are often needed to obtain a stay of the eviction and prevent the loss of the incapacitated person's apartment. Once appointed, a Guardian is usually able to pay the back rent or correct the nuisance condition so that the apartment which is the incapacitated person's home can be retained.

Continue reading "New York Article 81 Guardianship Proceedings Can Arise in Housing Proceedings" »

Many New York Estates and New York Guardianships contain assets in the form of real estate such as single or multi-family homes. Other possible assets can also include a condominium or cooperative apartment. These properties are a valuable, and many times the most valuable, asset owned by a decedent or an incapacitated person.

Problems often arise when the estate Executor or Administrator or Article 81 Guardian need to sell these assets to make a monetary distribution to beneficiaries or to pay expenses. Frequently, there are other persons who are living in these properties and remain there after the appointment of the fiduciary and they refuse to vacate the premises to allow the property to be marketed and sold. Persons who may be living in a house or apartment can range from children of the decedent or the incapacitated person to third party friends.

When a situation arises requiring the removal of a person from property as described above, the most common procedure is to file a Summary Eviction proceeding in the County where the property is located. This is the most common and expeditious method especially when dealing with non-relative occupants. For example, if the decedent had a Queens Probate or Brooklyn Probate and left a house in such County, the eviction proceeding would be filed in the Landlord-Tenant Part of the New York City Civil Court in such County.

Landlord-Tenant proceedings can be complicated and it is a good practice to obtain legal guidance from an attorney with experience in these matters. I have represented many individuals in Landlord-Tenant cases throughout New York. In an eviction case, there is usually an initial Notice sent to the occupant advising him or her to vacate by a certain date or Court proceedings will then be commenced. If the person fails to vacate as demanded in the Notice, a proceeding is filed in the Court to have the person evicted.

While eviction proceedings are "Summary" in nature, meaning that the process to have a Judge hear and determine a case is streamlined, the procedural aspects of these cases usually result in many adjournments and extensions. The ultimate consequence is that the Estate Administration or Settlement can be delayed for many months until the eviction process is completed.

In the Guardianship setting, a reverse scenario may occur. When a person becomes incapacitated they may be unable to pay the rent on the apartment where they live. Due to this non-payment of rent, the landlord may start an eviction proceeding against an incapacitated person who may be unable to defend himself or herself until a Guardian is appointed. In such situations, when a petition for Guardianship is initially filed with the Court, the Court may issue an Order Staying or putting on hold the eviction case until a Guardian is appointed who can either pay rent or otherwise defend the incapacitated person's interest. Mental Hygiene Law section 81.23 provides that the Guardianship Court has the power to grant such a provisional remedy. There have been many instances when I have represented persons to be appointed as an Article 81 Guardian when I have obtained this type of relief and prevented the incapacitated person from being evicted from his or her home.

The ownership of real estate and tenancy rights relating to Estate and Guardianship proceedings can be very complicated and involve very valuable interests. As a New York Guardianship and New York Estate and Trust Lawyer, I have helped my clients recognize and deal with these issues.

Continue reading "New York Estates and Guardianships May Involve Landlord-Tenant Proceedings" »

New York Guardianship Lawyers are often asked by clients as to the type of Guardianship that is needed concerning an alleged incapacitated person ("AIP"). The New York Probate Lawyer Blog has discussed many instances where the Court has appointed a guardian for both the person and property of the AIP. In fact, in a Manhattan Guardianship, Queens Guardianship, Brooklyn Guardianship or any other county, the Court typically appoints the same person as both property management and personal needs guardian. New York Mental Hygiene Law (MHL) Section 81.22 concerns personal needs powers and Section 81.21 concerns property management.

While most Guardianship proceedings are initiated by a petition filed by a family member such as a spouse or child, many times the guardianship case is started by a hospital or nursing home. Sometimes, the local social services department starts the case after it receives information from Adult Protective Services that a person may be at risk.

A nursing home or hospital may file a Guardianship petition with the Court because a family member fails or refuses to do so and the institution needs to be paid. Payment may require a Guardian to either access the AIP's assets or make an application for Medicaid.

The situation described above presented some interesting issues in a Long Island Guardianship case recently. In Matter of Restaino, decided by Justice Arthur M. Diamond (Supreme Court, Nassau County), on August 29, 2012 and reported in the New York Law Journal on September 7, 2012, an extended care facility filed a Nassau County Guardianship case seeking to be appointed only as property management special guardian for property so it could apply for Medicaid for the AIP to pay for the AIP's care. It was the facilities' view that it did not need to ask the Court for the appointment of a personal needs Guardian since the Family Healthcare Decisions Act would provide a mechanism for the AIP's son or the facility to make health care decisions for the AIP.

The FHCDA came into existence in 2010 and provides a priority list of persons who would have authority to make health care decisions for incapacitated patients.

After reviewing the FHCDA the Court determined that the appointment of a personal needs Guardian was necessary since the act did not provide the extensive authority for the decision maker and protection for the AIP that was given to a personal needs Guardian. The Court ultimately appointed the extended care facility as special Guardian of the property and the AIP's son as Guardian of the person.

As a Guardianship attorney, I work closely with my clients who are family members or friends of an AIP to determine the best course for having the Court appoint a Guardian. While sometimes there is a contested Guardianship, most often, families and friends pursue Guardianship so that the AIP's personal and property affairs can be kept in order and decisions can be made in the best interest of the person who is incapacitated.

Continue reading "New York Guardianship Proceedings Concern Guardianship for Personal Needs and Property Management" »

A New York Guardianship proceeding requires a hearing before the Court. Mental Hygiene Law (MHL) section 81.11 states, in part, that "a determination that the appointment of a guardian is necessary for a person alleged to be incapacitated shall be made only after a hearing."

MHL Section 81.02 provides that the appointment of a Guardian must be based upon "clear and convincing evidence." Typically, at such hearings, individuals who have had personal contact with the alleged incapacitated person ("AIP") can testify as to their observations as to the AIP's ability to engage in activities of daily living. Such testimony can also relate to various events that have occurred concerning the AIP such as the AIP forgetting where he or she lived or experiencing hallucinations. These types of events may indicate a loss of capacity.

The guardianship attorney for the petitioner usually calls these witnesses to testify in Court and can present other evidence in the form of documents that may show incapacity such as unusual transfer of assets. Of course the AIP has a right to oppose the petitioner's request for Guardianship. As provided in MHL 81.11 the AIP can call his or her own witnesses, be represented by an attorney and cross examine witnesses.

In some cases, especially where there are few third party witnesses to the AIP's activities, a petitioner may want to have the AIP testify to demonstrate to the Court that the AIP lacks capacity. By using in-court testimony, the petitioner can try and show that the AIP lacks the ability to understand or appreciate his or her medical or personal needs or is unable to demonstrate the ability to recall or handle finances. These situations have resulted in a controversy as to whether the AIP, like a criminal defendant, has the right to refuse to testify against him or herself.

The recent case of Matter of G.P., decided by Judge James D. Pagones of the New York State Supreme Court, Dutchess County on July 26, 2012, involved this issue. Judge Pagones determined that since the appointment of a Guardian resulted in the loss of certain individual freedoms and liberties, such as making medical decisions and determining where to live, an AIP cannot be "compelled to testify as a witness for the petitioner...."

When representing a petitioner in a Guardianship proceeding, particularly where the Guardianship is contested, I work closely with the client to determine the witnesses who can best tell the Court, based upon personal knowledge, about the AIP's ability to handle their personal affairs and property management. The decision in Matter of G.P. demonstrates that a petitioner cannot rely on just presenting the AIP to the Court, but must have competent independent witnesses to meet the "clear and convincing" proof required for a Guardianship appointment.

Continue reading "A New York Alleged Incapacitated Person Cannot Be Forced to Testify" »

The New York Probate Lawyer Blog has had many posts regarding issues and requirements of an Article 81 Guardianship Proceeding. These proceedings involve a determination as to whether an individual is incapacitated and, if so, the appointment of an appropriate Guardian.

The determinations that are made by the Court involve many different persons which may include the alleged incapacitated person; a petitioner (usually a family member); and a Court Evaluator. In some cases third parties are involved such as a Nursing Home, Adult Protective Services, New York State Mental Hygiene Legal Service and Medicaid.

A Supplemental Needs Trust ("SNT") is often a critical component of the Guardianship process. In a typical situation a person who is incapacitated may be entitled to a large monetary award due to a personal injury action. Since the incapacitated person would also qualify for government benefits such as Medicaid and SSI, the SNT provides a means by which the monetary funds can be set aside for extra benefits without the loss of the governmental entitlements. In the Guardianship proceeding, the Court authorizes the Guardian to establish the SNT and to transfer the funds into the Trust thus avoiding any loss of benefits. The SNT trustees, who are also designated by the Court, then administer the trust for the benefit of the disabled person. The trustees selected are commonly the family members who are the Guardians.

Once the SNT is established, the trustees can make expenditures for such things as computers, vacations, extra care and other items which the governmental benefits do not pay for without losing the governmental coverage for other items such as medical care. A good explanation of this process is provided in a recent case decided by Justice Howard H. Sherman on April 19, 2012 and reported in the New York Law Journal on May 14, 2012 entitled Matter of Geraldine R. In this case the Department of Social Services (Medicaid) claimed that the Supplemental Needs Trust trustees did not need to obtain prior Court approval to pay for items such as a vacation, purchase of a computer, printer and television, and educational programs. The Court found that it had authority to approve these items prior to the expenditure.

In fact, it is the usual and appropriate manner for trustees of a SNT to obtain prior Court approval of their expenditures. The trustees can then avoid a later denial by the Court and the requirement that they reimburse the trust for improper expenses.

I have represented many clients in connection with Guardianship proceedings and the establishment of a Supplemental Needs Trust. These cases require a Court hearing and I work closely with my clients and their families to help them through what can be a complex court process.

Continue reading "New York Guardianship Proceedings Also Involve Payments from a Supplemental Needs Trust" »

Article 81 of the New York Mental Hygiene Law (MHL) provides the substantive and procedural statutes regarding New York Guardianships. As previously talked about in many past posts in the New York Probate Lawyer Blog, a Guardian can be appointed to handle a person's property management and personal needs when the person is determined by the Court to be incapacitated. However, the determination of incapacity is not always easy. Certainly, when a person has suffered a severe illness or accident and is completely dependent upon others for assistance with activities of daily living (i.e., the person cannot walk, talk or feed him/herself), the need for a Guardian is clear.

On many occasions though a person may be living alone or have some type of part-time care but is exhibiting the effects and deterioration of daily functioning that puts into question their capacity to adequately handle their property or personal affairs without risk to their well-being.

In these situations difficult questions arise on many levels. The first major hurdle may be the emotional quandary of having to bring a Court proceeding against a parent or other close relative to impose a Guardianship. The alleged incapacitated person often has enough cognitive ability to oppose the appointment and may be offended by the introduction of control over their affairs even though such supervision is needed to prevent future harm that may occur without the appointment.

New York Guardianship Lawyers are frequently asked by family members to help them decide the best course of action to take in these situations. Guardianship attorneys know that there is never a simple or textbook answer to these questions since the individuals and circumstances are unique in every situation. Sometimes family members refuse to get involved. In such instances, Adult Protective Services may be contacted and Guardianship proceedings will be commenced by the New York City Department of Social Services.

Once a New York City Guardianship proceeding is started, the next concern may be to actually show by "clear and convincing evidence" (MHL Section 81.02) that the person is, in fact, incapacitated. This may require an actual hearing or trial during which witnesses can testify as to the alleged incapacitated person's ability to handle activities of daily living and his or her recent actions that reflect capacity. For example, the fact that a person leaves home and gets lost or cannot recall the names of relatives or the location of the banks where his accounts are held all tend to indicate the level of a person's cognitive abilities.

Manhattan Guardianship proceedings, like those in all other New York Counties, involve the story of an alleged incapacitated person and their ability to attend to their present life's activities while confronting the possible effects of disease or injury. It is typically the final decision of the Guardianship Court as to what extent, if any, such person needs assistance and, if so, who should be appointed as Guardian to provide the proper supervision.

Continue reading "The Commencement of a New York Guardianship Proceeding Can Present Difficult Decisions" »

A New York Guardianship Lawyer can advise a client with regard to the Guardian's duties to protect the assets of the incapacitated person. Mental Hygiene Law (MHL) Section 81.21 is entitled "Powers of guardian; property management" and provides the various property management powers that are given to the Guardian. These powers are to be used to collect, preserve and apply the Guardianship property for the benefit of the person who is incapacitated.

The Mental Hygiene Law provides that the Guardian must file an Annual Report with the Court (MHL Section 81.31). The filing of the Report provides a means by which the Court can review whether the Guardian is acting in a proper manner on a year to year basis. These Annual Reports are typically reviewed by a Court appointed Court Examiner who provides a report to the Judge who is supervising the Guardianship case. The Judge then reviews the report and if the account is satisfactory, signs an Order approving the Report.

The Guardianship accounting process is somewhat different than the Accounting Proceedings that occur in the Surrogate's Court regarding a decedent's estate. It is very common that when settling an estate the final Estate Accounting is approved informally by the interested parties. In other words, the parties simply review the Executor's Accounting or the Administrator's Accounting and sign a Release form. There are no formal proceedings or accounting that is filed with the Surrogate's Court. The process of probating a New York Will and settling a New York Estate does not require that an annual or a final account be approved by the Court. However, formal accounting proceedings requiring the Surrogate's Court approval are sometimes required. In a Guardianship matter such as a Manhattan Guardianship, Nassau Guardianship, Queens Guardianship or other Court proceedings, annual and final Accountings must be filed and approved by the Court.

Probate and Guardianship Attorneys in New York can assist their clients when preparing the accounts that are needed to report the actions taken by them as fiduciaries. The best advise is to maintain complete records and copies of all papers showing all the financial transactions that were entered into. Also, hiring a fiduciary accountant can simplify the preparation of the accounting schedules that are required by the Court for reporting all information. Acting as a fiduciary such as a Guardian, Executor, Administrator or Trustee involves accepting the responsibility to protect and manage someone else's assets. Proper guidance from a good Estate lawyer or Guardianship lawyer is essential to performing fiduciary duties properly and having the Court approve of the actions taken. Legal representation and diligence regarding property management is especially important where family members are fighting amongst themselves concerning the affairs of the person who is incapacitated. As recently reported in the Beverly Hills Courier on May 2, 2012, there is an ongoing dispute between Zsa Zsa Gabor's husband and daughter concerning the management of her affairs. Although the article reports that the parties are attempting to settle the matter, each side will need to have a complete record of financial transactions concerning Ms. Gabor in order to fully access the situation and to present their case to the Court, if necessary.

Continue reading "New York Guardianship Proceedings Protect the Assets of the Incapacitated Person" »

A New York Estate Planning Attorney can advise a client regarding the preparation of documents such as a Last Will, Living Will, Health Care Proxy, Power of Attorney and Living Trust. By preparing these documents an individual can provide protection to him or herself and their family during life and after death and avoid protracted Guardianship proceedings and Estate Litigation.

The New York Probate Lawyer Blog has discussed many issues regarding Article 81 Guardianship Proceedings. New York Guardianship proceedings are usually necessary when a person becomes incapacitated and does not have a Living Will, Health Care Proxy, Power of Attorney or Living Trust. These documents are advance directives that allow designated agents to make health care, end of life and property management decisions without the delay and complications of seeking court appointments. Unfortunately, in many instances such directives are not prepared and the assistance of a New York Guardianship Attorney will be required to prepare the Court petition and process the Guardianship proceeding. Guardianship proceedings are filed in the County where the incapacitated person resides or is physically present (MHL §81.05) I have represented many clients in Queens Guardianships, Manhattan Guardianships, Brooklyn Guardianships and proceedings in other counties as well.

The creation and signing of other types of documents are also important in both the pre and post death setting. For example, individuals who own businesses should prepare documents such as Shareholder and Partnership Agreements that define the rights and interests of the respective owners and provide specific instructions regarding the transfer of an owner's interest upon death or disability. The failure to seek guidance from a New York Estate Planning Attorney with regard to succession planning can result in disputes and litigation after the death of one or more of the business owners. Such was the case with regard to the founders of the company that created the Archie comics book character. As reported in Estate of Denial on April 26, 2012 the disputes that arise between successors can transform a once peaceful company setting into disarray.

Certainly, having a Last Will which provides for a clear disposition of assets and takes into account those assets that pass by operation of law such as joint accounts, is a fundamental necessity for post death security.

A recent article by Rob Clarfield in Forbes on April 25, 2012 entitled, "7 Major Errors in Estate Planning" provides a short-hand guide to some current considerations. The 7 "errors" discussed in the article are:

1. Not having a plan
2. Online or DIY rather than professionals
3. Failure to Review Beneficiary Designations and Titling of Assets
4. Failure to Consider the Estate and Gift Tax Consequences of Life Insurance
5. Maximizing annual gifts
6. Failure to Take Advantage of the Estate Tax Exemption in 2012
7. Leaving assets outright to Adult Children

As is true in every estate plan, a comprehensive analysis of a person's desires and intentions and family and assets is needed to determine the proper course to follow for their personal plan. Putting the proper documents into place not only provides lifetime stability and protection, but also prevents Estate Litigation in Probate Courts that be destructive to family harmony and costly to the estate beneficiaries.

Continue reading "New York Estate Planning Provides Protection Both Before and After Death" »

The appointment of a Guardian under Article 81 of the Mental Hygiene Law ("MHL") is subject to the procedures set forth in the statute. The proceeding is commenced by filing an Order to Show Cause and Verified Petition with the New York Supreme Court. The petitioner contains a significant amount of information concerning the alleged incapacitated person ("AIP") including a designation of the AIP's ability to manage activities of daily living (MHL Section 81.08).

Manhattan Guardianships, as well as Guardianship proceedings in other New York counties, require that notice of the proceeding be given to the AIP's spouse, parents, adult children, adult siblings and the persons with whom the AIP resides (MHL Section 81.07).

Information regarding the AIP's family may not always be readily available. This is particularly so where the Guardianship proceeding is commenced by a non-related party such as a New York Department through Adult Protective Services or a medical facility or a nursing home.

It is not uncommon for a group of relatives to be at odds concerning the appointment of a Guardian. Different individuals may have competing views as to whether a Guardian should be appointed and, if so, who the most appropriate person is to act as Guardian of the Person or Property. Sometimes, one of the parties to the Court action has already been exercising control over the AIP's property and personal affairs, possibly through the use of a Durable Power of Attorney or Health Care Proxy. Such person may resent interference from other family members and try to restrict their access to the AIP or involvement with decision making. In these situations, a full hearing of the competing claims and assertions can be held by the Court in order to ascertain what is in the best interest of the AIP.

A Bronx Guardianship case in which competing family views were presented to the Court was recently decided by the Honorable Alexander W. Hunter, entitled Matter of G.V.S., decided on December 16, 2011 and reported in the New York Law Journal on January 23, 2012.

In G.V.S., the AIP was a 73 year old person who became incapacitated due to a stroke. A Guardianship Petition was filed by the person's daughter. Testimony at the Court hearing was given by the daughter, two sons, the person's long-time companion, the person's son-in-law and brother. Family members had complained that the petitioner-daughter had tried to control the AIP's affairs and had excluded them from contact with the AIP.

Although the Court appointed the daughter as Guardian of the AIP's person and property, the Court directed that she was not allowed to prevent the other family members from having access to the AIP and that she must keep them informed concerning the AIP's health and medical condition.
G.V.S. demonstrates that a Guardianship proceeding not only involves matters regarding the AIP's ability to care for his or her affairs, but also issues concerning the friends and relatives who might be involved in the person's physical care and property management. Guardianship attorneys and their clients need to review and evaluate all of these aspects when commencing a Guardianship case so that the Court can be presented with all of the relevant information to make a determination that will be for the long-term benefit of the AIP.

Continue reading "New York Guardianship May Involve Many Family Members with Contentious Relationships" »